It is Mewalaal Chaudhary who is responsible for all these disturbances, he has also admitted himself – read what is written in the investigation report of the appointment scam

Mewalaal Chaudhary, who became a minister after the election results in Bihar, has been accused of scams in Bihar Agricultural University appointments. He was forced to resign as minister after all-around clutches. The report of the commission of inquiry headed by retired judge Justice Syed Mohammad Mahfuz of Patna High Court had said, ‘Mevalal is responsible for large scale manipulation, favoritism and manipulation.’ FIR was registered against him based on the 2016 report of the commission Was done.

Let us tell you what was said in this inquiry report, ‘The appointment of Assistant Professor / Junior Scientist has been largely manipulated, biased, altered, manipulated in academic points, overwriting in remarks that rules. Is a violation of All this was done to select his people. Dr. Mevalal was the VC and the Chairman of the Selection Board at that time, so he is responsible for this. The report said, “It is not acceptable for a public servant to break the trust and cheat in this way. During the stay of VC between 2010 and 2015, the recruitments in 2012 have been disturbed which is a criminal conspiracy.

Following complaints against Chaudhary, the Governor and the Chancellor of the University had constituted the Justice Alam Commission and asked for an inquiry. In 2011, Bihar Agricultural University had 281 vacancies. The report also asked how 161 people were appointed when the selection board selected only 115 names. Did the members of the selection committee remain silent spectators?

The report said, “161 people have been appointed, while the merit list has only 115 names.” SL is written in front of the names of the selected people in the handwriting of Dr. Mevalal Chaudhary. ”The report stated that Dr. Mevalal presented his stand and admitted that he had filled the Remark in the column himself. The second witness also accepted this.

The report also said that Chaudhary had also given Excellent Remark in front of some names. He told the commission that it meant very good performance but it does not mean that he was selected. The report said that Sowan Debnath’s SL number 310, who appeared in an interview for social science, was exquisite but his name was written in front of him. His name was not even among those appointed, it did not mean that Excellent was selected at all.

The investigation report stated that all the situations indicate that Dr. Mewalaala Chaudhary himself was handling appointments and also giving the remark. He was in the hands of Marx’s tabulation and total marks and then giving the remark. The Commission found that there were at least 20 candidates who got good points but were not selected.